Archive for June, 2009

Instructions

Tuesday, June 30th, 2009

“Finally, it has arrived! The super duper doohickey with the detachable thingamajig. Hmmmm … nice box … kind of hard to get open … argh … ahhh … there … box cutter got’er done … oops … directions on the outside of the box say don’t use box cutter …oh well, it’s only a little scratch right there. Hey … it’s not assembled … dang! Guess I gotta get the instructions …  (pause while looking at instructions) these instructions are too complicated … I can put it together without those silly things.”

And it is very possible that you are mechanically inclined enough to put this piece of equipment together. But what about that scratch that has been unintentionally placed? Unless you read and understand the instructions, you are unaware of the cautions/warnings and other pertinent information that could help avoid damage to yourself, others or the equipment.

User manual’s, technical manuals, work instructions, work documents, protocols, process instructions, policies … whew and wow! So many ways to provide information, but my personal favorite is the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP).

The standard operating procedure is a wonderful tool for controlling work. It defines those subtle details that make the difference between success and failure of the work you are performing. WIKIPEDIA (the on-line encyclopedia) defines the SOP as follows:

A standard operating procedure is a set of instructions having the force of a directive, covering those features of operations that lend themselves to a definite or standardized procedure without loss of effectiveness. Standard Operating Policies and Procedures can be effective catalysts to drive performance improvement and improving organizational results.

Have you ever heard of someone performing something twice because of a forgotten, misplaced, overlooked, ignored (you get the point) step in the process because they were not following the SOP? Using a well-written SOP (and following it word-for-word) drastically increases your chance for success in the task you are performing. Some of my experience comes from working in the Nuclear Power Field. An example of how a typical task would be performed is as follows.

An Engineer reads aloud from the “Master” SOP, “Turn the nut clockwise, one revolution using the encapsulated nut rotating apparatus.” A worker crouched down over a very expensive and shiny piece of equipment makes eye contact with the engineer and repeats “Turn the nut clockwise one revolution using the encapsulated nut rotating apparatus.” The worker using the encapsulated nut rotating apparatus then turns the nut clockwise one revolution. He makes eye contact with the engineer and states, “The nut has been turned clockwise one revolution using the encapsulated nut rotating apparatus, check.” An Inspector standing next to the worker monitoring his every movement then states, “The nut has been turned clockwise one revolution using the encapsulated nut rotating apparatus, check.” The Engineer then states, “The nut has been turned clockwise, one revolution using the encapsulated nut rotating apparatus.” A second Inspector that has been standing next to the engineer and monitoring every movement in the building states, “The nut has been turned clockwise one revolution using the encapsulated nut rotating apparatus.” The Engineer and second Inspector then sign that the step has been performed.

Granted, you probably are not going to go to this length in ensuring that the written word is followed verbatim. But, hopefully, prior to starting that very important task you eventually will perform countless times, you read through the SOP relating to the task. Actually, if the work environment allows it, have an authorized copy of the SOP right at your side and follow it word-for-word. And if for some reason the SOP isn’t working for you, stop and revise it to describe clearly the correct procedure to be used in the future.

Scott D. Ferraro, Quality Control Manager

References: WIKIPEDIA (the on-line encyclopedia).

 

Novel (Swine) Influenza A (H1N1) Virus

Tuesday, June 23rd, 2009

As we all probably know by now, the World Health Organization (WHO) raised the worldwide pandemic alert level to Phase 6 in response to the ongoing global spread of the Novel Influenza A (H1N1) virus. A Phase 6 designation indicates that a global pandemic is underway.

Being in the business of infection control, I and most of you who are reading this know that the most important thing that we can do to limit the spread of this virus and to reduce the chances of becoming infected ourselves is to simply wash our hands regularly with either a water aided or waterless topical antimicrobial product and regularly clean our environmental surfaces with an EPA registered Hard Surface Disinfectant product. But how do we know that these products will actually kill the Novel H1N1 strain? This strain is the nastier mutated brother of the Human H1N1 strain — right? So, if the product that I am using has been shown to be effective in killing Human Influenza, will it kill the new Novel strain? You must assume NO, unless the product has been tested and proven effective against this specific strain.

If you are using one of these products, look on the label or call the manufacturer to see if the product has been proven to be effective against the Novel (Swine) Influenza strain. Or, if you are making these types of products, a testing laboratory with the CDC approved Novel H1N1 strain, such as BioScience Laboratories can conduct the appropriate test to see if your product is in fact effective against the new strain.

For current information on the H1NI Pandemic, visit http://www.cdc.gov/H1N1FLU/.
 
Kyle McGovern, MBA
Senior Account Executive
 

 

Microbicides and Mechanisms of Virus Inactivation

Tuesday, June 9th, 2009

To date, the mechanisms of virus inactivation by microbicides are not well understood. Several modes of inactivation have been studied quite superficially. High temperature treatment is known to induce major changes in quaternary protein structures, resulting in a loss of continuity of the viral capsid icosahedral geometry. Hypochlorite is considered an oxidizing and cross-linking agent that causes viral protein disintegration. Ultraviolet (UV), supposedly, targets a small portion of a protein molecule containing vulnerable amino acids with high photochemical lability to UVOn the molecular level, the mechanism of inactivation was first studied with representatives of the genus Enterovirus. It was shown that structural differences in the VP1 region of these viruses are crucial for inactivation with glutaraldehyde. Sensitive and moderately sensitive enteroviruses exhibited lysine residues in the outermost DE and BC loops of VP1 major capsid protein, while resistant viruses had no lysine residues in the N-terminus, β-strand D, BC, DE, and G2H loops of VP1. The identity in the VP1 region of MNV and human NoV is less than 50% which suggests the possibility of substantial discrepancies in their sensitivity to inactivation. The discrepancies observed among seven genetically closely related enteroviruses raises concern that testing results obtained using surrogate pathogens, even closely related, may not always be adequately extrapolative to human viruses.

Volha  Dzyakanava, Ph.D., Manager of the Virology Laboratory

Will Hospital Dress Codes Help Reduce the Spread of Pathogens?

Tuesday, June 2nd, 2009

The American Medical Association (AMA) will be considering a resolution at their House of Delegates meeting in Chicago on June 13-17 to address the role of clothing and accessories (neckties, jewelry, wrist watches, etc.) in the spread of pathogens in hospitals. Resolution 720 advises that hospitals adopt dress codes that “minimize transmission of nosocomial infections, particularly in critical and intensive care units.”

 

The resolution also specifically refers to the United Kingdom’s “bare below the elbows” policy.  If passed, such a resolution would cause a major fashion change in hospitals — no more long sleeve white lab coats. The proposed resolution is expected to help healthcare workers be more compliant with hand washing guidelines, as there will be less concerns about getting jewelry, wrist watches and long sleeves wet.  Avoiding wet shirt sleeves and wrist jewelry is one of the driving forces behind using alcohol-based gels. What have you heard from your customers reagarding this resolution?  If passed, do you think this will change the demand for alcohol-based hand sanitizers?